The role of NGOs in international development
Do we go top-down, bottom-up, or somewhere in between?
The issue
Public opinion on the role of NGOs in development is often divided. In a 2019 survey, Gallup found that 32 percent of respondents worldwide do not have confidence in NGOs or charitable organizations. Despite this, NGOs working in developing countries are often seen as more effective at delivering services than government agencies. However, when incentives and expectations are unaligned, NGOs can end up doing more harm than good. More often than not, this occurs when efforts are either too top-down or bottom-up, rather than somewhere in the middle.
Where NGO efforts tumble
In Uganda, researchers found that NGO entry was associated with increased infant mortality in villages that already had government health workers. Researchers attribute this lowered standard of care to a combination of incentives that deter NGO health workers from providing free health services. In Ghana, researchers studied the impact of a multi-sectoral participatory development program run by an international NGO. Not only did the program fail to increase well-being overall, it also decreased the well-being of its most fervent supporters by failing to meet their expectations. In both these cases, we witness a crowding out effect, whereby resources are shifted away from existing institutions into the NGO that ultimately do not improve quality of life. Hence, instead of competing for public service delivery, NGOs and governments must work together for better coordinated action and resource allocation.
Definition
participatory development involves local communities in the planning and implementation of projects that directly impact them
Where NGO efforts transcend
A study in India found that an NGO’s prior engagement with communities increased the adoption of improved cookstoves by 30 percent. Researchers discern that the NGO was able to achieve this by lowering transaction costs for both beneficiaries and service providers. Moreover, in Indonesia, despite the lack of strong government institutions, the activism of NGOs resulted in improve minimum wage standards. Specifically, districts with local labor NGOs were able to close this wage gap by around one-third. The success of these interventions demonstrates the importance of aligning development goals with the needs of local communities. When implemented successfully, these efforts also prove cost-effective as communities effectively invest in themselves. These more bottom-up approaches are, however, limited in scope.
Closing thoughts
In line with the evidence presented, more thorough analyses suggest that NGOs would benefit from a blended approach to development. That is, one that combines elements from both top-down and bottom-up efforts. This involves striking the balance between efficiency and community participation, a delicate balance that international NGOs struggle to achieve. Nonetheless, they will need to achieve this to compete with the quality of service delivery provided by their local counterparts.
As someone from Bangladesh I think NGOs should have a much bigger role in development.
4 ideas where governments can create an enabling environment for the big NGOs like BRAC.
1) School and education vouchers will enable poor parents to send kids to the schools of their choice backed by public funding. In this way, NGOs can have good incentives to perform and also help with education delivery.
2) Healthcare vouchers. Same benefits as school vouchers.
3) Poor countries have very low judicial capacity. Governments can promote alternate dispute resolution (ADR) for property disputes, contracts and family laws. This can enable NGOs to augment the judicial capacity of the country.
4) Charter cities. This is probably the most radical of my proposals. Governments should lease out some underdeveloped land that's preferably close to a port. In this land the NGOs can build their city with its separate legal system and civil police force. The charter city can fast track the process of bringing first world institutions in a poor country. This can enable entrepreneurship and FDI. The host government can get a share of the charter cities' tax revenue in exchange.